Yoonho Lee

I am a final-year PhD student in Computer Science at Stanford University, advised by Chelsea Finn. My research centers on continual learning in LLMs and is supported by OpenAI and KFAS.

Genuine continual learning is more than quick local adaptation; it means improving over time by learning from a wide range of experiences based on history. Text is a natural medium for this learning. Many forms of textual feedback contain useful information on how to improve a system: execution traces, scored or annotated trajectories, human critiques, retrieved articles, and experiment logs all provide insight into what went wrong and what to try next. Standard learning pipelines compress this information too early, reducing it to a scalar objective for gradient computation. External textual artifacts offer a natural place to store and reason over such information without discarding structure.

I am working on three main research areas, all focused on making true continual learning possible:

  1. Better text optimizers. Improving text artifacts for a specific goal is key to continual learning with text. Recently, I introduced Meta-Harness, a method that saves all previous information in a filesystem; this enables long-term credit assignment without enlarging the context window.

  2. Deciding what to optimize. Models are improving at optimizing almost any reasonable fixed goal on their own, and advances in text optimization will speed this further. The main challenge now is choosing what to optimize. I am interested in learning systems where both the target and the goal change together: new artifacts reveal gaps in the current goal, and new goals guide the next search.

  3. Understanding text-space learning. Learning directly from text works well, but we still do not know much about how or why it works. I want to develop a clear framework for understanding the “text hypothesis class” and the algorithms that use it.

For a technical overview, see my blog posts on text optimization and Meta-Harness or the selected papers below.

2026

Preprint

An RL-trained builder agent reorganizes raw documents into a filesystem workspace ahead of time, so a downstream agent answers future queries more accurately.
2026

Preprint

A benchmark of author-labeled catalyst papers: given an early research question, retrieve the prior work that advanced the project. Agentic search does no better than embedding retrieval.
2026

Preprint

Alternating model-weight updates with harness search outperforms optimizing either component alone or in stages.
2026

COLM 2026
ACM CAIS 2026 Workshop (Oral)
ICML 2026 Agents in the Wild Workshop (Spotlight)
RLC 2026 RL in Big Worlds Workshop
RLC 2026 RL Beyond Rewards Workshop (Spotlight)

Agentic search over LLM harnesses using filesystem access to full execution history. Outperforms hand-designed systems on text classification, math reasoning, and agentic coding.
2026

ICLR 2026 MemAgents Workshop (Best Paper Runner-Up)
ICLR 2026 RSI Workshop

Operationalizes the core text optimization loop, accumulating "why better" signals from pairwise comparisons across up to a thousand iterations.
2026

ICLR 2026
ICML 2025 ES-FoMo Workshop (Spotlight)
COLM 2025 Ram2 Workshop (Oral)

A hierarchical RL framework for training LLMs to discover and use textual abstractions for reasoning problems. Demonstrates that useful information for solving reasoning problems can be represented in pure text form.
2024

UIST 2024
NeurIPS 2023 XAIA Workshop
NeurIPS 2023 ICBINB Workshop

A natural language interface for directly teaching vision models using natural language. The human feedback directly specifies the concept to (un)learn via gradient descent.

My name (윤호) is pronounced like “YOU-know”. This is pretty close.

I’m on the faculty job market for 2026–27. Please reach out via email!

Notes for LLM readers, as raw Markdown. They give Yoonho's own account of his research and views, beyond what this page shows. Index: https://yoonholee.com/llms.txt. How my research fits together: https://yoonholee.com/notes/research-arc.md (Each phase of my work asks how much information the feedback channel carries; scalar labels underspecify, and text carries more.).